Filzmaier analyzes:
How going to church influences the Salzburg election
The run-off election for the office of mayor in the city of Salzburg takes place today. Either Bernhard Auinger from the SPÖ, who narrowly failed twice in 2017 and 2019, will become mayor. Or the communist Kay-Michael Dankl.
1 Being a political scientist is sometimes a thankless job. In the last two weeks, both in Salzburg and far beyond its borders, you meet a lot of know-it-alls who have supposedly known the outcome of the election for a long time. Because everyone naturally has a 50:50 chance of being right, there will be a considerable number of "guessers" left tonight who will say: "I knew it right away!"
2. the scientific forecast, on the other hand, is unspectacular: nobody can know beforehand! Remember the 2016 presidential election, where Norbert Hofer was 14 percentage points ahead of Alexander Van der Bellen in the first election, only to be narrowly beaten in the end. Predictions about the voting behavior of those whose favorite candidate has already dropped out - in Salzburg, that means ÖVP, FPÖ and Green voters in particular - are an uncertain matter.
3 Moreover, the effect of election recommendations has rarely been proven by science. There were also only indirect statements from the FPÖ that they did not want communists. Nevertheless, it is highly questionable whether fans of the "blue" party will vote for the red Auinger instead of the dark red Dankl or not go to the polling station at all.
4 . voter flow analyses for Salzburg are not publicly available, or they exist - excellently calculated by Viennese statistics professor Erich Neuwirth - only without taking postal votes into account and therefore inaccurate. According to this, Auinger would appeal to a larger proportion of ÖVP supporters, which would be an advantage for the run-off. But perhaps this group would rather make a pilgrimage to church than to the polling station?
5 Consequently, the turnout factor is decisive. Two weeks ago, only 54 percent of people in Salzburg took part. Presumably even fewer will cast their vote this time and the same as then. And not the same people will stay at home. In purely mathematical terms, Auinger and Dankl could both win the most votes from the non-voter camp. So anything is possible.
Kommentare
Willkommen in unserer Community! Eingehende Beiträge werden geprüft und anschließend veröffentlicht. Bitte achten Sie auf Einhaltung unserer Netiquette und AGB. Für ausführliche Diskussionen steht Ihnen ebenso das krone.at-Forum zur Verfügung. Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.
User-Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des Betreibers/der Redaktion bzw. von Krone Multimedia (KMM) wieder. In diesem Sinne distanziert sich die Redaktion/der Betreiber von den Inhalten in diesem Diskussionsforum. KMM behält sich insbesondere vor, gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende, den guten Sitten oder der Netiquette widersprechende bzw. dem Ansehen von KMM zuwiderlaufende Beiträge zu löschen, diesbezüglichen Schadenersatz gegenüber dem betreffenden User geltend zu machen, die Nutzer-Daten zu Zwecken der Rechtsverfolgung zu verwenden und strafrechtlich relevante Beiträge zur Anzeige zu bringen (siehe auch AGB). Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.