After ruling on FPÖ
“Standard” boss goes after the Supreme Court after ruling
The Supreme Court (OGH) recently ruled that Fabian Schmid, senior investigative editor at "Der Standard", may be referred to as a "political activist" by the FPÖ - the editor-in-chief of the pink paper then blew his top on X (formerly Twitter).
"Pathetic, wrong - and dangerous to boot," raged "Standard" boss Gerold Riedmann. He has since deleted the post (see screenshot above). Probably for good reason, as some users could do little with the criticism of the Supreme Court.
Among other things, Riedmann was accused in the reactions of questioning the independent judiciary. If such a statement had come from the ranks of the FPÖ, he (Riedmann) would probably have been the first to criticize, it was said.
Although Riedmann defended himself and said that criticism was allowed, he eventually deleted the tweet anyway. In the end, there was also an apology - see the following post:
The "Standard" had recently caused a stir with harsh reporting on the private life of Green Party top candidate Lena Schilling. Riedmann was once again accused of a lack of seriousness on X after the Supreme Court ruling.
The process was triggered by "Standard" reports about accusations against FPÖ member of parliament Udo Guggenbichler. The Viennese FPÖ provincial party secretary Michael Stumpf had criticized that a journalist should not act as a "political activist".
The "Standard" and Schmid then took legal action against this, but were unsuccessful in the first two court instances.
The Supreme Court has now also ruled that Schmid must accept the term (at least in this case, note). The newspaper is known to repeatedly oppose the political views of the FPÖ.
This article has been automatically translated,
read the original article here.
Kommentare
Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser,
die Kommentarfunktion steht Ihnen ab 6 Uhr wieder wie gewohnt zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
das krone.at-Team
User-Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des Betreibers/der Redaktion bzw. von Krone Multimedia (KMM) wieder. In diesem Sinne distanziert sich die Redaktion/der Betreiber von den Inhalten in diesem Diskussionsforum. KMM behält sich insbesondere vor, gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende, den guten Sitten oder der Netiquette widersprechende bzw. dem Ansehen von KMM zuwiderlaufende Beiträge zu löschen, diesbezüglichen Schadenersatz gegenüber dem betreffenden User geltend zu machen, die Nutzer-Daten zu Zwecken der Rechtsverfolgung zu verwenden und strafrechtlich relevante Beiträge zur Anzeige zu bringen (siehe auch AGB). Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.