Are there imitators?
Agrarpapers: “The municipality of Mutters has shown it!”
In July 2022, Ernst Schöpf presented the so-called "Agrarpapers", which show how the land was once shifted. The municipality of Mutters is successfully reclaiming these, as a Krone reader points out. He sees the village in the low mountain range as a role model. And he hopes that many other imitators will follow suit in order to build up more pressure.
The so-called "Agrarpapers", which were presented in July 2022 by the then president of the municipal association Ernst Schöpf as well as Leonhard Steiger and Werner Lux from the association "Gemeindeland in Gemeindehand", caused heated discussions in the state.
The former Green mayor of Innsbruck, Georg Willi, even spoke of the "biggest criminal case in Tyrol" at the time. A reminder: 120 years ago - in 1904 - Tyrol's farmers called on the provincial government to transfer ownership of communal land to those entitled to use it following the "First General Farmers' Day". The reason given at the time was that it was the people's legal opinion that farmers had always owned the land they used. Six years later, a municipal ordinance from 1866 was amended accordingly. As a result, the municipalities were able to transfer ownership of forest land to a small number of authorized users simply by means of a municipal council resolution.
"Mutters had the courage and the energy"
"Over the past 100 years, large parts of the real estate assets of 170 municipalities were transferred to around 400 agricultural communities without compensation on behalf of Tyrolean state politics dominated by the Farmers' Association," Schöpf, Steiger and Lux calculated. They spoke of "billions in assets", as this involved around a fifth of the total area of Tyrol.
Nothing more has been heard about the "Agrarpapers" since then. But now "Krone" reader Helmut Zander from Mutters has spoken out. He is pleased that the village has shown how it can be done. "With Mayor Hansjörg Peer at the helm, we managed to join forces in 2014 to transfer back parts of the former municipal estate." Although the process is not yet complete, "Mutters is the only municipality in North and East Tyrol that has had the courage and energy to take this first step".
The beneficiaries were and are the farmers' association and its members.
„Krone“-Leser Helmut Zander
"Provincial government never put this into practice"
The Krone reader has been preoccupied with the issue of the Gemeindegutsagrargemeinschaften (GGAG) for some time. "It is a long and disgusting story of how Tyrolean municipalities have had their property 'taken' and 'transferred' to the GGAG. The beneficiaries were and are the farmers' association and its members." It is important to bear in mind that we are talking about 3,500 square kilometers. "That's the area of the districts of Kitzbühel, Kufstein, Innsbruck City and the entire Außerfern, i.e. around a third of Tyrol." The "Krone" reader even speaks of a "theft".
What he finds equally annoying: "In the Constitutional Court rulings of 1982 and 2008, it was clearly decided that this former municipal property had never belonged to the GGAG and would not belong to them in the future. This was never acknowledged and implemented in practice by the provincial government."
Hope rests on red Tyrolean mayors
The reader criticizes the fact that politicians continue to condone the injustice. "Although they have sworn an oath of office that reads 'for the good of the citizens and the communities', the current situation shows that this is not the case."
A glimmer of hope is that "the red mayor of Zams is now also taking up arms against GGAG". Should a transfer also take place there, "then other red mayors in Tyrol could also join in, which would ultimately also force the hand of the ÖVP".
This article has been automatically translated,
read the original article here.
Kommentare
Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser,
die Kommentarfunktion steht Ihnen ab 6 Uhr wieder wie gewohnt zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
das krone.at-Team
User-Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des Betreibers/der Redaktion bzw. von Krone Multimedia (KMM) wieder. In diesem Sinne distanziert sich die Redaktion/der Betreiber von den Inhalten in diesem Diskussionsforum. KMM behält sich insbesondere vor, gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende, den guten Sitten oder der Netiquette widersprechende bzw. dem Ansehen von KMM zuwiderlaufende Beiträge zu löschen, diesbezüglichen Schadenersatz gegenüber dem betreffenden User geltend zu machen, die Nutzer-Daten zu Zwecken der Rechtsverfolgung zu verwenden und strafrechtlich relevante Beiträge zur Anzeige zu bringen (siehe auch AGB). Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.