Bankruptcy in the local council
Where election campaign costs remain “limitless” again this year
Before every election, at least one party has the idea of capping campaign costs. However, the black majority in the town hall did not even want to discuss a 30,000 euro limit before the municipal elections in January.
In Tulln, FPÖ city councillor Andreas Bors chose the most recent council meeting for this not-so-new initiative. However, his urgent motion to pass an upper limit of 30,000 euros was immediately rejected by the People's Party, which has an absolute majority. The reason given was that it was simply not an issue for the municipal council.
"Tulln should be a role model for a fair, transparent and citizen-oriented election campaign. The time for wastefulness is over," emphasized Bors in the run-up to the meeting. After the meeting, the tone of the Freedom Party was harsher: "When it comes to a separate coat of arms for Nitzing, which is actually also within the authority of the state, there is a long and wide-ranging discussion in the municipal council, but the ÖVP didn't even want to discuss our proposal!"
Other parties would be in favor of the border
The other parties in Tulln, however, would even have had something to gain from the FPÖ's proposal. According to regional media, the SPÖ considers the expenditure of the equivalent of around 2 euros per eligible voter to be more than reasonable, while an agreement for the Greens would be "desirable". The Neos would prefer to reduce all party subsidies.
This article has been automatically translated,
read the original article here.
Kommentare
Willkommen in unserer Community! Eingehende Beiträge werden geprüft und anschließend veröffentlicht. Bitte achten Sie auf Einhaltung unserer Netiquette und AGB. Für ausführliche Diskussionen steht Ihnen ebenso das krone.at-Forum zur Verfügung. Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.
User-Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des Betreibers/der Redaktion bzw. von Krone Multimedia (KMM) wieder. In diesem Sinne distanziert sich die Redaktion/der Betreiber von den Inhalten in diesem Diskussionsforum. KMM behält sich insbesondere vor, gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende, den guten Sitten oder der Netiquette widersprechende bzw. dem Ansehen von KMM zuwiderlaufende Beiträge zu löschen, diesbezüglichen Schadenersatz gegenüber dem betreffenden User geltend zu machen, die Nutzer-Daten zu Zwecken der Rechtsverfolgung zu verwenden und strafrechtlich relevante Beiträge zur Anzeige zu bringen (siehe auch AGB). Hier können Sie das Community-Team via unserer Melde- und Abhilfestelle kontaktieren.