Sobotka lashes out

Scolding for Rosenkranz: “Held hostage by Kickl”

Sobotka: "If I had received Orbán in Parliament and only invited Nehammer and Wöginger, the Republic would have burned".

(Bild: APA/EVA MANHART)

Former National Council President Wolfgang Sobotka (ÖVP) has strongly criticized his controversial successor Walter Rosenkranz from the FPÖ. He is "being held hostage" by Herbert Kickl.

Not even the feisty former ÖVP National Council President Wolfgang Sobotka has managed to do this: to cause a stir at the very first meeting of the National Council presidency.

Greens: "Absolutely intolerable situation"
The Greens in particular want to limit the responsibilities of the new parliamentary leader Walter Rosenkranz (FPÖ). As President of the National Council, the fraternity member is not only officially the "second man in the state", but also Chairman of the National Fund for Victims of the Nazi Regime.

The "second man in the state" has had to put up with a lot of criticism since taking office - and it is by no means getting any quieter.

(Bild: APA/EVA MANHART)

For the Greens, this is an "absolutely intolerable" situation. Despite all the criticism Sobotka has received in office, he has always been praised for his fight against anti-Semitism. In the "Krone" interview, he shares his doubts about Walter Rosenkranz.

"Krone": Mr. Sobotka, Walter Rosenkranz has been in office for a month and criticism of his understanding of his office is growing. Shouldn't Rosenkranz be given a grace period?
Wolfgang Sobotka: I judged Walter Rosenkranz by his balanced inaugural speech. He declared that he was a team player and that he wanted to be the president of all 183 MPs. I don't see that yet. Imagine if I had received Viktor Orbán in Parliament and only invited Karl Nehammer and August Wöginger to talk to Orbán and then the EU flag had been missing from the official photos. The Republic would have been on fire.

Are you implying that the criticism wasn't loud enough?
It could have been a bit louder. Because there's no question of Rosenkranz being independent. He is playing the provocateur who is being held hostage by FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl. He doesn't want to take note of the decisions that have been made. 

Which decisions do you mean specifically?
I hear that he wants to question the new seating arrangement in the plenary chamber, which was decided by four parties. He is also planning to reduce the popular guided tours through Parliament and he also wants to reduce the lighting in the House.

How do you know about Rosenkranz's plans?
This is being reported from within Parliament. 

How could Parliament oppose this?
The parties can pass resolutions that there should be no restrictions. 

Isn't it wrong to immediately demonize Rosenkranz?
He behaved very insensitively on Pogrom Remembrance Day (9 November). Reducing the lighting in parliament is an external matter, I don't mind it being reduced, but if he continues like this, he will only leave scorched earth in his wake and he will attack the substance of parliamentarianism.